Nami Wan 2.2 Extend Spicy B vs AI Video Watermark Remover: Which video to video API Should You Use? (2026)
Nami Wan 2.2 Extend Spicy B vs AI Video Watermark Remover for video to video: pricing, parameters and when to pick which — both are testable in the NamiFusion playground.
Nami Wan 2.2 Extend Spicy B and AI Video Watermark Remover are both video to video models on NamiFusion — same REST API, same credit system, near-zero switching cost. The only real question is which to reach for first. Here is a practical decision guide by price, control and use case.
Spec snapshot
· Nami Wan 2.2 Extend Spicy B: video to video, 5 tunable parameters, about $0.150 per typical run
· AI Video Watermark Remover: video to video, 1 tunable parameters, about $0.050 per typical run
When should you pick which?
· Budget-first / high volume: pick AI Video Watermark Remover — lower per-run cost compounds at scale.
· Need fine-grained control: pick Nami Wan 2.2 Extend Spicy B — more tunable parameters, better for reproducible pipelines.
· Still unsure? Test both: run the same prompt through each model in the playground (exact quote before submit) — that is the fastest answer.
How hard is it to switch?
Near zero on NamiFusion: both models share the same POST /run endpoint — change the model_id and parameter names, and your keys, credits and polling logic all carry over.
FAQ
Can I use both models at once?+
Yes — one API key can call any model in the store; each is billed at its own price.
How current is this comparison?+
Specs and prices come from live model configuration; this page refreshes automatically every day.
Does the free trial cover both models?+
Signup bonus credits can only be used on selected models, and eligibility may change. The playground shows the exact quote for both models before submission.